Re: [PATCH 2/9] x86 idle: remove NOP cpuinfo_x86.hlt_works_ok flag

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 03/31/2011 07:41 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
>>
>> What it was was bad power supplies or low-capacitance, high-inductance
>> power distribution that happened to work with MS-DOS which always burned
>> the CPU at 100% and therefore left the power draw relatively consistent
>> current.  A proper OS putting the CPU in HLT produced a lot more high
>> frequency noise on the power busses, with disastrous results without
>> proper bypass.
> 
> And also chipset errata in some cases - eg some revisions of the CS5510
> hung the box solid if a CPU hlt occurred during an IDE transfer. I don't
> think any CS5510s are still around although I've had mail from someone
> with a CS5520 in use not that long ago so who knows!
> 
> The joy of ancient history.

Ah, yes, I guess there was a special cycle on the bus which the chipset
could misinterpret.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/