Re: [PATCH 05/10] Core checkpoint/restart support code

[Serge E. Hallyn]

Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx):
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:27:53 -0500 "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Andrew (Cc:d), did you see this thread go by, and it did it look
> > in any way more palatable to you?  Have you had any thoughts on
> > checkpoint/restart in the last few months?  Or did that horse quietly
> > die over winter?
> 
> argh, it was the victim of LIFO.
> 
> All I can say at this stage is that I'll be interested next time it
> comes past, sorry.

Thanks, that's good to know.

As you know, we started with a minimal patchset, then grew it over time
to answer the "but how will you (xyz) without uglifying the kernel".
Would you recommend we go back to keeping a separate minimal patchset,
or that we develop on the current, pretty feature-full version?  I'm not
convinced believe there will be bandwidth to keep two trees and do both
justice.

thanks,
-serge

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature