On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 21:14:06 -0500
Anthony Liguori<anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If someone was going to seriously go about doing something like this, aSupporting only a single architecture sounds like a significant
better approach would be to start with QEMU and remove anything non-x86
and all of the UI/command line/management bits and start there.
There's nothing more I'd like to see than a viable alternative to QEMU
but ignoring any of the architectural mistakes in QEMU and repeating
them in a new project isn't going to get there.
architectural mistake... only x86 deserves clean code?
-Scott