Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags

From: Eric Blake
Date: Mon Apr 25 2011 - 08:38:09 EST


On 04/24/2011 11:49 AM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
>> My problem with FIND_* is that we are messing with the well understood
>> semantics of lseek().
>
> fcntl() looks a better fit for FIND_HOLE/DATA anyway.

With fcntl(), it would have to be something like:

off_t offset = start;
if (fcntl (fd, F_FIND_HOLE, &offset) != 0)
; // find failed
// offset is now set to the next location after start

That is, offset has to be passed as an input _and_ output parameter,
since we can't use the int return value of fcntl to convey off_t
information, and since the optional third argument of fcntl has
traditionally been no wider than a pointer which is not the case for
off_t on 32-bit platforms.

--
Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature