Re: [PATCH v3] uio/pdrv_genirq: Add OF support

From: Michal Simek
Date: Wed Apr 27 2011 - 07:05:50 EST


Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:50:54AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
Adding OF binding to genirq.
Version string is setup to the "devicetree".

Compatible string is not setup for now but you can add your
custom compatible string to uio_of_genirq_match structure.

For example with "uio" compatible string:
static const struct of_device_id __devinitconst uio_of_genirq_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "uio", },
{ /* empty for now */ },
};

Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>

---

v3: Fix irq binding
Use "devicetree" as version string

v2: Remove additional resource binding
Setup correct version string
Clear compatible string
---
drivers/uio/uio_pdrv_genirq.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/uio/uio_pdrv_genirq.c b/drivers/uio/uio_pdrv_genirq.c
index 7174d51..c8d565a 100644
--- a/drivers/uio/uio_pdrv_genirq.c
+++ b/drivers/uio/uio_pdrv_genirq.c
@@ -23,6 +23,10 @@
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+
#define DRIVER_NAME "uio_pdrv_genirq"
struct uio_pdrv_genirq_platdata {
@@ -97,6 +101,30 @@ static int uio_pdrv_genirq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
int ret = -EINVAL;
int i;
+ if (!uioinfo) {
+ int irq;
+
+ /* alloc uioinfo for one device */
+ uioinfo = kzalloc(sizeof(*uioinfo), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!uioinfo) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to kmalloc\n");
+ goto bad2;
+ }
+ uioinfo->name = pdev->dev.of_node->name;
+ uioinfo->version = "devicetree";
+
+ /* Multiple IRQs are not supported */
+ irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (irq < 0) {

PowerPC and x86 will return 0 for an unassigned IRQ, as will most platforms.

I have looked at it and platform_get_irq for unassigned IRQ returns -ENXIO.

It is there from 2006 (drivers/base/platform.c)
"[PATCH] driver core: platform_get_irq*(): return -ENXIO on error"
(sha1 305b3228f9ff4d59f49e6d34a7034d44ee8ce2f0)

Maybe you have this patch in your queue but it is not in the mainline 2.6.39-rc5.

Maybe should return NO_IRQ instead.
But anyway for current code I would prefer to use this condition to cover all architectures NO_IRQ definition.

irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
if (irq == -ENXIO || irq == NO_IRQ)
uioinfo->irq = UIO_IRQ_NONE;
else
uioinfo->irq = irq;

or of course to only NO_IRQ if we do s/-ENXIO/NO_IRQ in platform_get_irq.

if (irq == NO_IRQ)
uioinfo->irq = UIO_IRQ_NONE;
else
uioinfo->irq = irq;

What do you think?

Thanks,
Michal


--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/