Re: [PATCH 00/69] faster tree-based sysctl implementation

[Eric W. Biederman]

Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> In particular I was referring to create_proc_entry. ÂIt takes
>> a path and an optional parent directory.
>
> I did something like that in this patch series I sent a month ago
> which was mostly ignored (except for a call from David Miller for
> feedback on the patches):
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1121889
>
> I'll see how I can add the optional parent directory in this patch series.
>
> Could you please take a look at a few patches in the above series?
>
> The ones that have "cookie:" add a cookie pointer to the
> ctl_table_header making it possible to skip duplicating ctl_table
> arrays in a few places in the kernel. After finishing this series I'll
> send one with the cookie..

The cookie changes seem particularly intrusive, and if I read your
patches properly the cookies are only useful for table sharing when
implementing network namespaces.  At first glance those changes seem
pretty horrible.

Do you also have a lot of network namespaces in the workloads you care
about?

Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/