Re: [BUG] fatal hang untarring 90GB file, possibly writebackrelated.

[Colin Ian King]

On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 18:18 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:56:17AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 11:50 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > This is the output of perf record -g -a -f sleep 5
> > > 
> > > (hopefully the list won't choke)
> > 
> > Um, this one actually shows kswapd
> > 
> > James
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > # Events: 6K cycles
> > #
> > # Overhead      Command        Shared Object                                   Symbol
> > # ........  ...........  ...................  .......................................
> > #
> >     20.41%      kswapd0  [kernel.kallsyms]    [k] shrink_slab
> >                 |
> >                 --- shrink_slab
> >                    |          
> >                    |--99.91%-- kswapd
> >                    |          kthread
> >                    |          kernel_thread_helper
> >                     --0.09%-- [...]
> > 
> 
> Ok. I can't see how the patch "mm: vmscan: reclaim order-0 and use
> compaction instead of lumpy reclaim" is related unless we are seeing
> two problems that happen to manifest in a similar manner.

That is a distinct possibility.
> 
> However, there were a number of changes made to dcache in particular
> for 2.6.38. Specifically thinks like dentry_kill use trylock and is
> happy to loop around if it fails to acquire anything. See things like
> this for example;
> 
[ text deleted ]

> Way hey, cgroups are also in the mix. How jolly.
> 
> Is systemd a common element of the machines hitting this bug by any
> chance?

Not in my case, using upstart on my machine.
> 
Colin


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/