Re: [PATCH 2/2] writeback: elevate queue_io() into wb_writeback()

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Wed May 04 2011 - 07:17:33 EST


On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 07:15:47PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > This should move to writeback_inodes_wb and be unconditional as
> > wb_writeback already always initializes it.
>
> Never mind :) wbc->wb_start has been killed in a later patch named
> "writeback: avoid extra sync work at enqueue time".

Even better. I was already wondering why we'd need two different
jiffies and jiffies + offset value in the writeback code.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/