Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] data integrity: Stabilize pages duringwriteback for ext4

[Darrick J. Wong]

On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 03:21:55PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Excerpts from Christoph Hellwig's message of 2011-05-04 14:46:44 -0400:
> > This seems to miss out on a lot of the generic functionality like
> > write_cache_pages and block_page_mkwrite and just patch it into
> > the ext4 copy & paste variants.  Please make sure your patches also
> > work for filesystem that use more of the generic functionality like
> > xfs or ext2 (the latter one might be fun for the mmap case).
> 
> Probably after the block_commit_write in block_page_mkwrite()

Yes, I'm working on providing more generic fixes for ext3 & friends too, but
they're not really working yet, so I was posting the parts that fix ext4, since
they seem usable.

> Another question is, do we want to introduce a wait_on_stable_page_writeback()?
> 
> This would allow us to add a check against the bdi requesting stable
> pages.

Sounds like a good idea.

> > Also what's the status of btrfs?  I remembered there was one or two
> > bits missing despite doing the right thing in most areas.
> 
> As far as I know btrfs is getting it right.  The only bit missing is the
> one Nick Piggin pointed out where it is possible to change mmap'd O_DIRECT
> memory in flight while a DIO is in progress.  Josef has a test case that
> demonstrates this.
> 
> Nick had a plan to fix it, but it involved redoing the get_user_pages
> api.

I ran the same six tests A-F on btrfs and it reported -ENOSPC with 1% of the
space used, though until it did that I didn't see any checksum errors.

--D
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/