Re: [PATCH 1/4] MFD: TWL6025: add phoenix lite support to twl6030

From: Liam Girdwood
Date: Sun May 08 2011 - 16:32:41 EST


On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 13:40 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:39:48AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:


> > + /* TWL6025 LDO regulators */
> > + struct regulator_init_data *ldo1;
> > + struct regulator_init_data *ldo2;
> > + struct regulator_init_data *ldo3;
> > + struct regulator_init_data *ldo4;
> > + struct regulator_init_data *ldo5;
> > + struct regulator_init_data *ldo6;
> > + struct regulator_init_data *ldo7;
> > + struct regulator_init_data *ldoln;
> > + struct regulator_init_data *ldousb;
> > + /* TWL6025 DCDC regulators */
> > + struct regulator_init_data *smps3;
> > + struct regulator_init_data *smps4;
> > + struct regulator_init_data *vio6025;
>
> this is just becoming really really ugly. You need a more clever way of
> handling this. Maybe passing an array of regulators and the array size
> instead of continuously adding fields to this structure.
>

Ok, I agree that optimising the platform data here is desirable, but I
think we will have to stick with this atm as the twl driver has some
rather annoying limitations that make optimising things like this a pita
atm.

I guess we should look at fixing the twl driver within TI in order to
make it more adaptable (i.e. support future twl ICs) and also a non
singleton device.

Liam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/