Re: Please don't hijack patches - even trivial ones (was: Re: [PATCH13/14] HPFS: Move declaration up, so that there are no out-of-scopepointers=

From: Jesper Juhl
Date: Mon May 09 2011 - 18:36:52 EST


On Tue, 10 May 2011, Mikulas Patocka wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, 9 May 2011, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 8 May 2011, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >
> > > Move declaration up, so that there are no out-of-scope pointers
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
>
> So change it to:
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
Kinda hard when it's already merged in mainline ;-)


> > Hmm. I'm a little currious how my original Signed-off-by got turned into a
> > Reported-by for this patch?
>
> I don't know. I probably checked the code independently after your report
> and ended up fixing exactly the same thing that you fixed.
>
Just seems a little odd that you would check the code based on my report
(you must have been aware of it given the reported-by) and then ending up
with the exact same fix would chose to submit a completely new patch with
the exact same contents but with you as author...

Ohh well, never mind - it's a trivial patch and the important thing is
that it got merged. I just got a little annoyed at seeing a patch that I
had submitted and even ping'ed people about later, getting merged with a
different author and me just listed as 'reported-by'... I just care about
these things, even for trivial stuff - it's a matter of "credit where
credit is due" even when the change is minor...

but let's just leave it where it is - the fix got merged, that's the
really important bit :-)

--
Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/