Re: [PATCH V2] fbcon -- fix race between open and removal of framebuffers

From: Jack Stone
Date: Tue May 10 2011 - 17:06:19 EST


Hi Tim,

One more quick question:

On 10/05/2011 13:47, Tim Gardner wrote:
+static struct fb_info *get_framebuffer_info(int idx)
+__acquires(&registered_lock)
+__releases(&registered_lock)
+{
+ struct fb_info *fb_info;
+
+ spin_lock(&registered_lock);
+ fb_info = registered_fb[idx];
+ fb_info->ref_count++;
+ spin_unlock(&registered_lock);
+
+ return fb_info;
+}

[snip]

static int
fb_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
__acquires(&info->lock)
@@ -1363,13 +1421,18 @@ __releases(&info->lock)

if (fbidx >= FB_MAX)
return -ENODEV;
- info = registered_fb[fbidx];
- if (!info)
+ info = get_framebuffer_info(fbidx);
+ if (!info) {
request_module("fb%d", fbidx);
- info = registered_fb[fbidx];
+ info = get_framebuffer_info(fbidx);
+ }
if (!info)
return -ENODEV;

This section of code implies that get_framebuffer_info can return NULL
but in that case wouldn't the fb_info->ref_count++ have oopsed?

You could add the simple case of

if(fb_info)
fb_info->ref_count++

to get_framebuffer_info. That should cover it.

Thanks,

Jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/