Re: [PATCH 14/17] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_writestraight

[Jan Kara]

On Wed 11-05-11 22:38:07, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> >   One more thing that I've noticed while looking through this patch: You
> > are removing several trace points (without actually removing the trace
> > point definitions BTW):
> > trace_wbc_writeback_start(&wbc, wb->bdi);
> > trace_wbc_writeback_written(&wbc, wb->bdi);
> > trace_wbc_writeback_wait(&wbc, wb->bdi);
> > trace_wbc_balance_dirty_start(&wbc, bdi);
> > trace_wbc_balance_dirty_written(&wbc, bdi);
> > trace_wbc_balance_dirty_wait(&wbc, bdi);
> > 
> > I guess they should be replaced with equivalent trace points that take
> > struct wb_writeback_work as an argument instead of just removing them?
> 
> OK. How about this change?
  Great. This should be fine. Thanks.

								Honza

> 
> ---
>  fs/fs-writeback.c                |    3 ++
>  include/trace/events/writeback.h |   33 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  mm/page-writeback.c              |    3 ++
>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-next.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c	2011-05-11 22:19:22.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/fs/fs-writeback.c	2011-05-11 22:20:50.000000000 +0800
> @@ -731,6 +731,7 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writ
>  		}
>  
>  retry:
> +		trace_writeback_start(wb->bdi, work);
>  		spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
>  		if (list_empty(&wb->b_io))
>  			queue_io(wb, work->older_than_this);
> @@ -739,6 +740,7 @@ retry:
>  		else
>  			progress = __writeback_inodes_wb(wb, work);
>  		spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
> +		trace_writeback_written(wb->bdi, work);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Did we write something? Try for more
> @@ -775,6 +777,7 @@ retry:
>  		 */
>  		spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
>  		if (!list_empty(&wb->b_more_io))  {
> +			trace_writeback_wait(wb->bdi, work);
>  			inode = wb_inode(wb->b_more_io.prev);
>  			spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
>  			inode_wait_for_writeback(inode, wb);
> --- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c	2011-05-11 22:19:22.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c	2011-05-11 22:20:50.000000000 +0800
> @@ -555,14 +555,17 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
>  		 * threshold otherwise wait until the disk writes catch
>  		 * up.
>  		 */
> +		trace_balance_dirty_start(bdi);
>  		if (bdi_nr_reclaimable > bdi_thresh) {
>  			pages_written += writeback_inodes_wb(&bdi->wb,
>  							     write_chunk);
> +			trace_balance_dirty_written(bdi, pages_written);
>  			if (pages_written >= write_chunk)
>  				break;		/* We've done our duty */
>  		}
>  		__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>  		io_schedule_timeout(pause);
> +		trace_balance_dirty_wait(bdi);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Increase the delay for each loop, up to our previous
> --- linux-next.orig/include/trace/events/writeback.h	2011-05-11 22:19:22.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/include/trace/events/writeback.h	2011-05-11 22:22:20.000000000 +0800
> @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(writeback_work_class, name,
>  DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_nothread);
>  DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_queue);
>  DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_exec);
> +DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_start);
> +DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_written);
> +DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_wait);
>  
>  TRACE_EVENT(writeback_pages_written,
>  	TP_PROTO(long pages_written),
> @@ -88,6 +91,30 @@ DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(writeback_bdi_reg
>  DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(writeback_bdi_unregister);
>  DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(writeback_thread_start);
>  DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(writeback_thread_stop);
> +DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(balance_dirty_start);
> +DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(balance_dirty_wait);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(balance_dirty_written,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, int written),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(bdi, written),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__array(char,	name, 32)
> +		__field(int,	written)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		strncpy(__entry->name, dev_name(bdi->dev), 32);
> +		__entry->written = written;
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("bdi %s written %d",
> +		  __entry->name,
> +		  __entry->written
> +	)
> +);
>  
>  DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(wbc_class,
>  	TP_PROTO(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct backing_dev_info *bdi),
> @@ -137,12 +164,6 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(wbc_class,
>  DEFINE_EVENT(wbc_class, name, \
>  	TP_PROTO(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct backing_dev_info *bdi), \
>  	TP_ARGS(wbc, bdi))
> -DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_start);
> -DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_written);
> -DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_wait);
> -DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_start);
> -DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_written);
> -DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_wait);
>  DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writepage);
>  
>  DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(writeback_congest_waited_template,
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/