Re: Sched_autogroup and niced processes

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 15:13 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> > Still, the other important problem is that we still seem to have a bug, even 
> > with the cgroup set to low prio seti@home is sucking up CPU resources ...
> 
> I don't see how.  

Agreed, with two groups, a spinner each, and then setting the group
weight low yields things like:

 1927 root      20   0  105m  672  192 R 98.1  0.0   0:20.50 bash  
 1933 root      20   0  105m  656  180 R  2.0  0.0   0:07.29 bash  

So all just seems to work as advertised.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/