Re: [PATCH -V5 00/24] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability

[Aneesh Kumar K.V]

On Thu, 12 May 2011 00:16:13 +0200, BjÃrn JACKE <bj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2011-02-28 at 16:11 -0500 Ted Ts'o sent off:
> > What is the current status of this patch series?  I seem to remember
> > that Christoph and Al Viro had some objections; have those been
> > cleared yet?  If not, can you summarize what their objections are?
> > 
> > To be honest I haven't been paying super close attention to this patch
> > series, and I'm curious what needs to happen with it one way or
> > another.
> 
> after the discussion of this path submission thread are there any major or
> minor issues left that prevent these to go upstream? I'd really love to see
> NFSv4 ACLs being available on Linux, too.
> 

I updated richaclv23 branch at 

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kvaneesh/linux-richacl.git;a=summary

which is rebased against latest linus tree.  The changes pass richacl
test against local file system. I am yet to test richacl on NFS
client. Once i get the results i will repost the series again. 

-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/