Re: [RFC] x86, NMI, Treat unknown NMI as hardware error

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On 05/15/2011 04:06 AM, huang ying wrote:
...
>>
>> yes, is not good. But at least we *must* provide a way to turn this new feature off
>> via command line I think. One of a reason for me is perf unknown nmis (at moment we seems
>> to have captured and cured all parasite NMIs sources but there is no guarantee we wont
>> meet them in future due to some code change or whatever). And bloating trap.c with
>> new if()'s is not that good I guess, that is why I asked if there a way to do all the
>> work via notifiers ;)
> 
> Yes.  We should consider about perf unknown NMI issues.  But compared
> with pushing all magic to user, I think the better way is to have a
> better default behavior in kernel.  For example, we can turn off
> unknown NMI as hwerr logic temporarily if there are more than 1 perf
> NMI events in action.  Is that reasonable?

  I'm personally fine even if it's enabled by default, only worried to have
an option to disable hwerr from boot line.

> 
> And, I am not a big fan of notifiers, that makes code hard to be
> understood.  If you have concerns about the size of traps.c, we can
> move all NMI logic to a new file.

  Ying, the concern is rather related to the code scheme in general. Since
we have notifiers I think the better way to be consistent here and use
hwerr notifier too. But it's IMHO ;)

> 
> Best Regards,
> Huang Ying

-- 
            Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/