linux-next: manual merge of the security-testing tree with Linus'tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi James,

Today's linux-next merge of the security-testing tree got a conflict in
include/linux/capability.h between commit 47a150edc2ae ("Cache user_ns in
struct cred") from Linus' tree and commit ffa8e59df047 ("capabilities: do
not drop CAP_SETPCAP from the initial task") from the security-testing
tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

diff --cc include/linux/capability.h
index d4675af,04fed72..0000000
--- a/include/linux/capability.h
+++ b/include/linux/capability.h
@@@ -546,8 -541,21 +541,10 @@@ extern bool has_capability_noaudit(stru
  extern bool capable(int cap);
  extern bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
  extern bool task_ns_capable(struct task_struct *t, int cap);
 +extern bool nsown_capable(int cap);
  
+ extern const kernel_cap_t __cap_empty_set;
+ 
 -/**
 - * nsown_capable - Check superior capability to one's own user_ns
 - * @cap: The capability in question
 - *
 - * Return true if the current task has the given superior capability
 - * targeted at its own user namespace.
 - */
 -static inline bool nsown_capable(int cap)
 -{
 -	return ns_capable(current_user_ns(), cap);
 -}
 -
  /* audit system wants to get cap info from files as well */
  extern int get_vfs_caps_from_disk(const struct dentry *dentry, struct cpu_vfs_cap_data *cpu_caps);
  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/