Re: [BISECTED] 2.6.39rc: kobject-related reboot after RAID array initialization(?) post-QUEUE_FLAG_REENTER-removal

From: Jens Axboe
Date: Mon May 16 2011 - 03:29:28 EST


On 2011-05-16 01:21, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:05:32 +0100 Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> After this change:
>>
>> commit c21e6beba8835d09bb80e34961430b13e60381c5
>> Author: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue Apr 19 13:32:46 2011 +0200
>>
>> block: get rid of QUEUE_FLAG_REENTER
>>
>> We are currently using this flag to check whether it's safe
>> to call into ->request_fn(). If it is set, we punt to kblockd.
>> But we get a lot of false positives and excessive punts to
>> kblockd, which hurts performance.
>>
>> The only real abuser of this infrastructure is SCSI. So export
>> the async queue run and convert SCSI over to use that. There's
>> room for improvement in that SCSI need not always use the async
>> call, but this fixes our performance issue and they can fix that
>> up in due time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> my system panics and reboots in early userspace. It is slightly
>> difficult to figure out where -- the reboot happens so fast -- but it is
>> either triggered by
>>
>> /sbin/mdadm --assemble --scan --auto=md
>>
>> (with mdadm v2.6.9, yes, I know, it's quite old but it works)
>>
>> or by
>>
>> /sbin/lvm vgscan --ignorelockingfailure --mknodes
>>
>> (most probably the former, since I don't see any sign of lvm running in
>> the text that blinks up right before the reboot, and the oops below
>> mentions md1, not anything lvmish.
>>
>> netconsole reports this (ignore the fact that md1 is resyncing, that's
>> because of previous instances of this bug!):
>>
>> [ 6.773532] md: md0 stopped.
>> [ 6.976368] md: bind<sdb1>
>> [ 6.978284] md: bind<sda1>
>> [ 6.980162] bio: create slab <bio-1> at 1
>> [ 6.981992] md/raid1:md0: active with 2 out of 2 mirrors
>> [ 6.983745] md0: detected capacity change from 0 to 271319040
>> [ 6.987345] md: md1 stopped.
>> [ 6.989411] md0: unknown partition table
>> [ 7.000464] md: bind<sdb3>
>> [ 7.002247] md: bind<sda3>
>> [ 7.003998] md/raid1:md1: not clean -- starting background reconstruction
>> [ 7.005669] md/raid1:md1: active with 2 out of 2 mirrors
>> [ 7.007330] md1: detected capacity change from 0 to 486936436736
>> [ 7.008982] md: resync of RAID array md1
>> [ 7.008984] md: minimum _guaranteed_ speed: 1000 KB/sec/disk.
>> [ 7.008985] md: using maximum available idle IO bandwidth (but not more than 200000 KB/sec) for resync.
>> [ 7.008988] md: using 128k window, over a total of 475523864 blocks.
>> [ 7.008990] md: resuming resync of md1 from checkpoint.
>> [ 7.176568] md1: unknown partition table
>> [ 7.350823] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>> [ 7.353166] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/dev
>> [ 7.355496] CPU 1
>> [ 7.355514] Modules linked in:
>> [ 7.360073]
>> [ 7.362310] Pid: 0, comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 2.6.39-rc4-00119-g584f790-dirty #11
>> System manufacturer System Product Name /P6T
>> [ 7.364629] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8122bb01>] [<ffffffff8122bb01>] kobject_put+0x11/0x4b
>> [ 7.366921] RSP: 0018:ffff88033fc0e510 EFLAGS: 00010202
>> [ 7.369178] RAX: 0000000400000008 RBX: 3d9e2838ffff8813 RCX: 0000000000000003
>> [ 7.371417] RDX: ffff8803396feec8 RSI: ffff8803391ea800 RDI: 3d9e2838ffff8813
>> [ 7.373621] RBP: ffff88033fc0e520 R08: ffff88033fc0e530 R09: 00000000000003e8
>> [ 7.375827] R10: 0000000001887509 R11: 0000000200000000 R12: ffff8803391ea800
>> [ 7.378040] R13: ffff8803396fee00 R14: ffff88033d9e2848 R15: 0000000000001055
>> [ 7.380265] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88033fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [ 7.382514] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
>> [ 7.384765] CR2: 00000000004051d0 CR3: 000000033a22c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
>> [ 7.387037] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> [ 7.389325] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> [ 7.391610] Process kworker/0:0 (pid: 0, threadinfo ffff88033e256000, task ffff88033e254300)
>> [ 7.393914] Stack:
>> [ 7.396196] ffff88033fc0e530 ffff88033d9e2800 ffff88033fc0e530 ffffffff81367f19
>> [ 7.398544] ffff88033fc0e580 ffffffff81381614 ffff88033a2669c0 3d9e2838ffff8803
>> [ 7.400876] 0000000000000053 ffff8803396fee00 0000000000000202 0000000000000246
>> [ 7.403207] Call Trace:
>> [ 7.405481] Code: 89 de 48 c7 c7 d8 ee 7d 81 31 c0 e8 c8 7b 33 00 e8
>> 9d 79 33 00 5b 41 5c c9 c3 55 48 89 e5 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 48 85 ff
>> 74 36 <f6> 47 3c 01 75 20 49 89 f8 48 8b 0f 48 c7 c2 ed ee 7d 81 be 53
>>
>> [ 7.411141] RIP [<ffffffff8122bb01>] kobject_put+0x11/0x4b
>> [ 7.413725] RSP <ffff88033fc0e510>
>> [ 7.416289] ---[ end trace 2a57282106bd5f52 ]---
>> [ 7.418831] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
>> [ 7.421364] Pid: 0, comm: kworker/0:0 Tainted: G D 2.6.39-rc4-00119-g584f790-dirty #11
>> [ 7.423926] Call Trace:
>>
>> (There is no call trace, ever. I guess it doesn't have time to get over
>> the network before the panic?)
>
> That is unfortunate....
>
> I'm having trouble seeing md implicated given the patch, but one never
> knows...
>
> I'd try reverting just the __blk_run_queue part of the patch.
>
> i.e. leave __blk_run_queue behaving how it did before the patch, but keep the
> blk_run_queue_async parts of the new code.
> If that still crashes, then there must be someone going wrong when scsi calls
> the new blk_run_queue_async.
> If it doesn't crash, then the recursion-protection of QUEUE_FLAG_REENTER must
> be protecting us from something else other than SCSI re-entering.

I don't think it's the re-enter part, it looks more like a missing
reference to the queue. The problem is most likely there before the
change as well, the difference is just that there's a bigger window
where the caller can now drop the reference before the queue is run and
thus accessed.

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/