Re: [GIT PULL] isci merge candidate

From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Mon May 16 2011 - 20:47:30 EST

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At a minimum It would require a more verbose interface to
> libsas/libata (or new libframe?) to allow us to deliver raw
> unsolicited frames into common protocol handlers.

...which is where SAS and SATA have been heading for a while, anyway.
With chained SAS expander setup you have a network, if an annoying,
manually configured and routed one. Over that network you deliver
frames of various types.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at