Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue May 17 2011 - 07:56:48 EST
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 01:06:52PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > maintainers (and not assume lack of ack after 24 hours means acceptance), or
> > >
> > > Wrong, 72 to 96 hours. Sunday to Wednesday/Thursday.
> > Not that this is really material (the argument is pretty much the same even had
> > you waited 3 days), but you are already wrong about the 'Sunday' part, because
> > you posted it to lkml on *Monday* 13:27 GMT:
> > Message-ID: <20110509132738.GB16919@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Mon, 9 May 2011 09:27:52 -0400
> Sigh. So you're only looking at the _second_ posting of them, not the first.
> Here's the message, minus the patch.
> | Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 19:24:07 +0100
> | From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Stultz <johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> | "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> | Subject: i8253 clocksource consolidation
> | Message-ID: <20110508182407.GN27807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | Ralf, John, Ingo, hpa,
I did not get that mail, at all. It's not in my spam mbox either.
This pretty much explains why you assumed us informed and should explain to you
why i was surprised by your way of handling the patch :-)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/