Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

From: Chris Wilson
Date: Sat May 21 2011 - 04:42:14 EST

On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee <ray-lk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki
> to the message ]
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr <luke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I submitted a month ago
> > against 2.6.38. Now 2.6.39 was just released without the regression being
> > addressed. This bug makes the system unusable... Some guys on IRC suggested
> > I
> > email, so here it is.
> >
> See the bugzilla entry for the bisection history.

Which has nothing to do with Luke's bug. Considering the thousand things
that can go wrong during X starting, without a hint as to which it is nigh
on impossible to debug except by trial and error. If you set up
netconsole, does the kernel emit an OOPS with it's last dying breath?

Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at