Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: use proper little-endian bitops

From: Joel Becker
Date: Tue May 31 2011 - 19:07:15 EST


On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 03:57:13PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 09:58:05PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> > Using __test_and_{set,clear}_bit_le() with ignoring its return value
> > can be replaced with __{set,clear}_bit_le().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Looks reasonable to me...
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Joel?

No argument here. Akinobu, do you want me to send it with ocfs2
fixes, or are you going to push it along?

Acked-by: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Joel

--

"Lately I've been talking in my sleep.
Can't imagine what I'd have to say.
Except my world will be right
When love comes back my way."

http://www.jlbec.org/
jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/