Re: [PATCHSET ptrace] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE/INTERRUPT andgroup stop notification, take#4
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Wed Jun 01 2011 - 01:39:16 EST
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 05:42:11PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 05/30, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > * PTRACE_LISTEN added. This puts tracee into quasi-active state where
> > wait(2) and sync ptrace requests fail and tracee is allowed to
> > re-trap into STOP to notify an async event.
> Personally, I think the whole series is fine. So far I only read it
> inline (without applying). I'll try to read it carefully patch-by-patch,
> it is always good to try to re-check the details, but I do not expect
> I'll find something which should delay this series from merging into
> ptrace tree.
Yeah, yeah, PTRACE_LISTEN turned out to be pretty easy to implement.
I didn't really have to change too much. I'll test different corner
cases (different thread doing waking/sleeping, race against INTERRUPT
kind of things) and let you know how it goes.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/