Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] KVM in-guest performance monitoring
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Jun 01 2011 - 08:15:52 EST
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:45 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 12:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 05/11/2011 06:55 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> perf maintainers: please consider the first three patches for merging
> >> (the
> >> first two make sense even without the rest). If you're familiar with
> >> the Intel
> >> PMU, please review patch 5 as well - it effectively undoes all your work
> >> of abstracting the PMU into perf_events by unabstracting perf_events
> >> into what
> >> is hoped is a very similar PMU.
> > Perf maintainers, ping?
Still struggling with merge window fallout, this is soon after that.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/