Re: linux-next: build warninga in Linus' tree
From: David Sterba
Date: Fri Jun 03 2011 - 07:11:27 EST
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:16:48AM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
> I've been playing around with resurrecting the basic sysfs
> capabilities that had been previously incorporated into btrfs.
> As it stands right now, it was relatively easy to re-implement sysfs
> as it was originally. However, that implementation of sysfs wasn't
> populated with much information (only total_blocks, blocks_used, and
Goffredo Baroncelli (CCed) posted a patch to enhance sysfs interface:
> I also had to reverse a small portion of code that was in the last
Restoring the code should not be a problem, the cleanup was too eager
and I think a sysfs inteface would be good, not only for debugging
purposes or tuning.
> If a CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG type configuration flag is ever introduced, it
> would be interesting to resurrect btrfs' sysfs capabilities.
Hearing about CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG again, seems worth to add it.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/