Re: [2.6.39] CIFS write failures where 2.6.38 works
From: Shirish Pargaonkar
Date: Sat Jun 04 2011 - 08:35:37 EST
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03. juni 2011 12:15, Suresh Jayaraman wrote:
>> [Cc linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> On 06/01/2011 03:41 PM, Helge Hafting wrote:
>>> At work I use cifs for accessing a windows server. This has worked fine
>>> for a long time, up to and including Debian's 2.6.38-2.
>>> I just installed Debians's 2.6.39-1, and had to give up on it.
>>> Mounting CIFS works, and I can see the files. But if I
>>> try to make a new file (with cp), I get a long delay.
>> What is the security mechanism you are using? If you seeing the problem
>> with ntlm, could you try using ntlmv2 and see whether the problem is
> In the beginning, I did not specify the mechanism. So, whatever the default
> The fstab entry was like this:
> \\servername\resource /mountpoint cifs
> 0 0
> I looked at cifs options, and tried to add "sign" and "sec=ntlmv2i". It made
> no difference. Still failure with 2.6.39, and mounting with these new
> options works fine with 2.6.38
> Helge Hafting
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Yes, I think wireshark trace would be really useful.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/