Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] x86-64: Emulate legacy vsyscalls
Date: Mon Jun 06 2011 - 12:21:30 EST
On 6 Jun 2011 at 17:59, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > FYI, incredible amount of work has gone into making pagefaults as
> > > fast and scalable as possible.
> > i wasn't talking about scalability (it's irrelevant anyway here),
> > only speed. [...]
> Which part of "fast and scalable" did you not understand?
uhm, not sure why you're so worked up here. is it because i said
'scalability' was completely irrelevant for the nx vsyscall page
> Just a couple of days ago i noticed a single cycle inefficiency in
> the pagefault fastpath, introduced in the 3.0 merge window. I
> requested (and got) an urgent fix for that:
so you must have measurements. what's the mentioned page faults take
in cycles before/after your fix? what's a normal int xx path take?
> So i ask you again, what is your basis for calling the #PF path on
> Linux a 'slowpath'? Is Linus's and my word and 5 years of Git history
> showing that it's optimized as a fastpath not enough proof for you?
which part of
> you must have realized by now that slow/fast path in this context were
> relative to int xx vs. pf processing.
did you not understand? do you have "Linus's and my word and 5 years of
Git history" to show that pf processing is seriously that much faster
than int xx processing?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/