[PATCH -tip v2 2/3] Add weak save_stack_trace_regs()

From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Wed Jun 08 2011 - 03:29:16 EST


Add weak symbol of save_stack_trace_regs() as same as
save_stack_trace_tsk() since that is not implemented
except x86 yet.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---

kernel/stacktrace.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/stacktrace.c b/kernel/stacktrace.c
index eb212f8..6fa38bc 100644
--- a/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -26,12 +26,19 @@ void print_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace, int spaces)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(print_stack_trace);

/*
- * Architectures that do not implement save_stack_trace_tsk get this
- * weak alias and a once-per-bootup warning (whenever this facility
- * is utilized - for example by procfs):
+ * Architectures that do not implement save_stack_trace_tsk or
+ * save_stack_trace_regs get this weak alias and a once-per-bootup warning
+ * (whenever this facility is utilized - for example by procfs):
*/
__weak void
save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
{
WARN_ONCE(1, KERN_INFO "save_stack_trace_tsk() not implemented yet.\n");
}
+
+__weak void
+save_stack_trace_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct stack_trace *trace)
+{
+ WARN_ONCE(1,
+ KERN_INFO "save_stack_trace_regs() not implemented yet.\n");
+}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/