Look for physical address from user space address/fixup - NET_DMA

[Michal Simek]

Hi,

I do some investigation how to speedup memory operations 
(memcopy/memset/copy_tofrom_user/etc) by dma to improve ethernet performance 
(currently for PAGE_SIZE operations).

I profiled kernel and copy_tofrom_user is the weakest place for network 
operations. I have optimize it by loop unrolling which gave me 20% better 
throughput but still no enough.

Then I added hw dma to the design and changed u-boot mem operations (saved me 5s 
in bootup time - loading 20MB kernel through 100Mbit/s LAN) and also I have add 
support to Linux memcpy (haven't measured improvement but there is some).

For copy_tofrom_user is situation a little bit complicated but I have prototyped 
it by dma without fixup to see improvement. There could be next 20%.

Based on this I have measured spending time on this code and I found that most 
of the time is spent on looking for physical address from user space address.
I need to get physical address because dma requires it. It is around 70% of 
total time.

I use for Microblaze the part of code shown below but it is slow. Do you know 
how to do it faster?

	pmd_t *pmdp;
	pte_t *ptep;
	pmdp = pmd_offset(pud_offset(
			pgd_offset(current->mm, address),
					address), address);

	preempt_disable();
	ptep = pte_offset_map(pmdp, address);
	if (pte_present(*ptep)) {
		address = (unsigned long) page_address(pte_page(*ptep));
		/* MS: I need add offset in page */
		address += address & ~PAGE_MASK;
		/* MS address is virtual */
		address = virt_to_phys(address);
	}
	pte_unmap(ptep);
	preempt_enable();


Currently this is my bottleneck to get better improvement.

Not sure if someone has ever tried to replace by dma with fixup support. That's 
the second thing where I would like to hear your opinion. Would it be possible 
to simplify it by access user space address and address + PAGE_SIZE? Or any 
other scheme?

There is also one option NET_DMA where I expect that dma will be used instead of 
mem operations. Is it correct assumption? Because I see that there are no irqs 
coming from dma. Dma test is working well.

Eric, David: How is it supposed to work?


Thanks,
Michal


--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/