[PATCH 10/14] netvm: Set PF_MEMALLOC as appropriate during SKB processing

[Mel Gorman]

In order to make sure pfmemalloc packets receive all memory
needed to proceed, ensure processing of pfmemalloc SKBs happens
under PF_MEMALLOC. This is limited to a subset of protocols that
are expected to be used for writing to swap. Taps are not allowed to
use PF_MEMALLOC as these are expected to communicate with userspace
processes which could be paged out.

[a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx: Ideas taken from various patches]
[jslaby@xxxxxxx: Lock imbalance fix]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
---
 include/net/sock.h |    5 +++++
 net/core/dev.c     |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 net/core/sock.c    |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index e3aaa88..e928880 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -668,8 +668,13 @@ static inline __must_check int sk_add_backlog(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *s
 	return 0;
 }
 
+extern int __sk_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
+
 static inline int sk_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
+	if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
+		return __sk_backlog_rcv(sk, skb);
+
 	return sk->sk_backlog_rcv(sk, skb);
 }
 
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 9393078..c228286 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -3089,6 +3089,23 @@ void netdev_rx_handler_unregister(struct net_device *dev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_rx_handler_unregister);
 
+/*
+ * Limit which protocols can use the PFMEMALLOC reserves to those that are
+ * expected to be used for communication with swap.
+ */
+static bool skb_pfmemalloc_protocol(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	switch (skb->protocol) {
+	case __constant_htons(ETH_P_ARP):
+	case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IP):
+	case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
+	case __constant_htons(ETH_P_8021Q):
+		return true;
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
+}
+
 static int __netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct packet_type *ptype, *pt_prev;
@@ -3098,15 +3115,28 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	bool deliver_exact = false;
 	int ret = NET_RX_DROP;
 	__be16 type;
+	unsigned long pflags = current->flags;
 
 	if (!netdev_tstamp_prequeue)
 		net_timestamp_check(skb);
 
 	trace_netif_receive_skb(skb);
 
+	/*
+	 * PFMEMALLOC skbs are special, they should
+	 * - be delivered to SOCK_MEMALLOC sockets only
+	 * - stay away from userspace
+	 * - have bounded memory usage
+	 *
+	 * Use PF_MEMALLOC as this saves us from propagating the allocation
+	 * context down to all allocation sites.
+	 */
+	if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
+		current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
+
 	/* if we've gotten here through NAPI, check netpoll */
 	if (netpoll_receive_skb(skb))
-		return NET_RX_DROP;
+		goto out;
 
 	if (!skb->skb_iif)
 		skb->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
@@ -3137,6 +3167,9 @@ another_round:
 	}
 #endif
 
+	if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
+		goto skip_taps;
+
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ptype, &ptype_all, list) {
 		if (!ptype->dev || ptype->dev == skb->dev) {
 			if (pt_prev)
@@ -3145,13 +3178,17 @@ another_round:
 		}
 	}
 
+skip_taps:
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
 	skb = handle_ing(skb, &pt_prev, &ret, orig_dev);
 	if (!skb)
-		goto out;
+		goto unlock;
 ncls:
 #endif
 
+	if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb) && !skb_pfmemalloc_protocol(skb))
+		goto drop;
+
 	rx_handler = rcu_dereference(skb->dev->rx_handler);
 	if (rx_handler) {
 		if (pt_prev) {
@@ -3160,7 +3197,7 @@ ncls:
 		}
 		switch (rx_handler(&skb)) {
 		case RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED:
-			goto out;
+			goto unlock;
 		case RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER:
 			goto another_round;
 		case RX_HANDLER_EXACT:
@@ -3202,6 +3239,7 @@ ncls:
 	if (pt_prev) {
 		ret = pt_prev->func(skb, skb->dev, pt_prev, orig_dev);
 	} else {
+drop:
 		atomic_long_inc(&skb->dev->rx_dropped);
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		/* Jamal, now you will not able to escape explaining
@@ -3210,8 +3248,10 @@ ncls:
 		ret = NET_RX_DROP;
 	}
 
-out:
+unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
+out:
+	tsk_restore_flags(current, pflags, PF_MEMALLOC);
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 8308609..ac36807 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -245,6 +245,22 @@ void sk_clear_memalloc(struct sock *sk)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_clear_memalloc);
 
+int __sk_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	int ret;
+	unsigned long pflags = current->flags;
+
+	/* these should have been dropped before queueing */
+	BUG_ON(!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_MEMALLOC));
+
+	current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
+	ret = sk->sk_backlog_rcv(sk, skb);
+	tsk_restore_flags(current, pflags, PF_MEMALLOC);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sk_backlog_rcv);
+
 #if defined(CONFIG_CGROUPS) && !defined(CONFIG_NET_CLS_CGROUP)
 int net_cls_subsys_id = -1;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(net_cls_subsys_id);
-- 
1.7.3.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/