[PATCH] Avoid potential NULL deref in irq_set_irq_wake()

From: Jesper Juhl
Date: Thu Jun 09 2011 - 17:23:24 EST


In kernel/irq/manage.c::irq_set_irq_wake() we call irq_get_desc_buslock()
which may return NULL (it calls into
__irq_get_desc_lock()-->irq_to_desc()-->radix_tree_lookup()-->radix_tree_lookup_element()
which can return NULL in a number of different situations). If it does
we'll dereference a NULL pointer - *Boom*.

irq_set_irq_wake() has lots of callers - I checked a few and I couldn't
find anything that guarantees that they won't call it with some input that
will cause irq_get_desc_buslock() to return NULL, so I think it's a good
thing to test and -EINVAL was the most sane error code in this situation
that I could think of.

Not all callers test the return value of irq_set_irq_wake(), but those
that do take != 0 to mean error as far as I can see, so they should be
fine. I guess those that don't test actually should, but that's a
different issue.

Feedback welcome.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
manage.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Found by the Coverity checker.
Untested except for build test.

diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index d64bafb..b42c15c 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -488,8 +488,11 @@ static int set_irq_wake_real(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on)
int irq_set_irq_wake(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on)
{
unsigned long flags;
- struct irq_desc *desc = irq_get_desc_buslock(irq, &flags);
int ret = 0;
+ struct irq_desc *desc = irq_get_desc_buslock(irq, &flags);
+
+ if (!desc)
+ return -EINVAL;

/* wakeup-capable irqs can be shared between drivers that
* don't need to have the same sleep mode behaviors.


--
Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/