Re: [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 0/22] 0: Uprobes patchset with perfprobe support

[Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli]

On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:42:24PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 18:28 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > - Breakpoint handling should co-exist with singlestep/blockstep from
> >   another tracer/debugger.
> > - Queue and dequeue signals delivered from the singlestep till
> >   completion of postprocessing. 
> 
> These two are important to sort before we can think of merging this
> right?

Yup.

Guess Srikar missed updating this part, but the first of the issues
(sstep/blockstep) is now fixed. Signal queueing is a work-in-progress.

Ananth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/