Re: Why is CONFIG_FHANDLE an option??

[Al Viro]

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:39:55PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:

> Why not?  Software needs to test *anyway*, since it might run on earlier
> kernels.  And "does that syscall return -ENOSYS" is self-documenting,
> while "is the version higher than $MAGIC_NUMBER" is *not*.  Especially since
> there's such thing as backports.
> 
> If you need to check that syscall is there, _check_ _it_.  Don't breed
> dependencies on version numbers.

PS: we have BSD_PROCESS_ACCT doing pretty much the same kind of thing.
And SYSVIPC.  And POSIX_MQUEUE.  And there's nfsservctl(2), also
config-dependent.  And eventfd(2), and inotify syscalls, etc.

There is such thing as optional system calls.  Always had been.  Deal
with that...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/