Re: [PATCH 1/2] coccicheck: add M= option to control which dir isprocessed

[Greg Dietsche]

On 06/08/2011 02:10 PM, Nicolas Palix wrote:
> I am not familiar with out-of-tree development but I guess that in
> that case we should
> also add a "-I $KBUILD_EXTMOD/include" ?
>
>    
I decided to skip doing this in V2 of the patch. I did a very quick test 
and cocci didn't seem to like two -I flags on one command line.
> The use of -I by Coccinelle depends on the other options (like
> -include_headers or -all_includes).
> Such options are retrieved from the comments in the cocci files.
> So the need for -I depends on the semantic patch you consider. I think
> it is thus better
> to be "exhaustive" in that case.
>
> Julia, is there any performance problem in doing so ?
>    

Greg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/