[PATCH 15/16 v2] stack_trace: Add weak save_stack_trace_regs()

[Steven Rostedt]

From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Add weak symbol of save_stack_trace_regs() as same as
save_stack_trace_tsk() since that is not implemented
except x86 yet.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: yrl.pp-manager.tt@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: 20110608070927.17777.37895.stgit@fedora15">http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110608070927.17777.37895.stgit@fedora15
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/stacktrace.c |   12 +++++++++---
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/stacktrace.c b/kernel/stacktrace.c
index eb212f8..d20c698 100644
--- a/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -26,12 +26,18 @@ void print_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace, int spaces)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(print_stack_trace);
 
 /*
- * Architectures that do not implement save_stack_trace_tsk get this
- * weak alias and a once-per-bootup warning (whenever this facility
- * is utilized - for example by procfs):
+ * Architectures that do not implement save_stack_trace_tsk or
+ * save_stack_trace_regs get this weak alias and a once-per-bootup warning
+ * (whenever this facility is utilized - for example by procfs):
  */
 __weak void
 save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
 {
 	WARN_ONCE(1, KERN_INFO "save_stack_trace_tsk() not implemented yet.\n");
 }
+
+__weak void
+save_stack_trace_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct stack_trace *trace)
+{
+	WARN_ONCE(1, KERN_INFO "save_stack_trace_regs() not implemented yet.\n");
+}
-- 
1.7.4.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/