Re: [Cocci] Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: if (ret) return ret; returnret; semantic patch

[Greg Dietsche]

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > except that 4 of the 5 ORs are cases where we want to do the -return ret; +
> > return ret; So I suppose for performance, I should actually add the +/- to
> > each of the 4 cases that we want cocci to generate a patch for?
> 
> Actually, it's probably not that big a deal.  It's only rewriting the ones 
> where there is a return ret just before, not all the returns in the code, 
> like I was originally thinking.

Ok :) I'll update the patch one last time - hopefully we've got everything nailed
down now :)

thanks for being so incredibly helpful!

Greg

> 
> julia
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/