Re: mmotm 2011-06-15-16-56 uploaded (mm/page_cgroup.c)
From: Mel Gorman
Date: Thu Jun 16 2011 - 12:51:58 EST
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 09:25:42AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 11:35 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > This patch removes definitions of node_start/end_pfn() in each archs
> > > and defines a unified one in linux/mmzone.h. It's not under
> > > CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES, now.
> > Does anyone remember *why* this did not happen in the first place? I
> > can't think of a good reason so I've cc'd Dave Hansen as he might
> > remember.
> You mean why it's not under CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES? I'd guess it's
> just because it keeps working in all configurations since the
> pg_data_t->node_*_pfn entries are defined everywhere.
> Is that what you're asking?
No, why was node_start_pfn() and node_end_pfn() defined optionally
on a per-architecture basis?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/