Re: [PATCH] ACPI, APEI, Add APEI _OSC support

[Matthew Garrett]

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:40:17AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 09:34 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > If the kernel has been configured with support for the feature then I 
> > think we ought to be able to assume that the kernel will support it at 
> > runtime.
> 
> There may be error during driver initialization.  That is what I am
> concerned.

That's true of any _OSC functionality.

> >> So I think we can do that in 2 steps.  At first, we just enable WHEA
> >> UUID, because that is easier to do.  Then we find a way to implement
> >> "APEI bit" in generic _OSC call.  Do you think that is a good idea?
> > 
> > I'm fine with that, providing that GHES isn't disabled purely because 
> > the WHEA UUID call wasn't successful.
> 
> Because we have not added the code to make generic _OSC call with "APEI
> bit" now, so if WHEA UUID call failed, we have no firmware first mode
> enabled.  So I think it is safe to disable GHES if WHEA UUID call
> failed.  But in another hand, keeping GHES has no harm too.  So I am OK
> to keep GHES if WHEA UUID call failed.

I see your point. But this does need to be fixed in the long run.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/