Re: [PATCH 2/5] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE
From: Denys Vlasenko
Date: Sat Jun 18 2011 - 04:58:55 EST
On Saturday 18 June 2011 10:30, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > I propose to define PTRACE_EVENT_STOP as 64 instead, leaving 64 low
> > PTRACE_EVENT_foo constants for possible future PTRACE_O_foo bits.
> > [32 should be enough too, but I feel paranoid today :)]
> But this might not be a bad idea. Given that we also support 32bit
> archs, going over 32 wouldn't help much tho.
In 2030, 32 bit will be sort of like 16 bit today :)
and we'll suddenly find it not impossible to use bit positions >= 32.
(and I will be so old it's not funny)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/