Re: [PATCH 6/7] ptrace: kill detah tracehooks

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 06/17, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> This patch kills tracehook_notify_death() by reimplementing the logic
> in its caller - exit_notify().  I opted for re-implementation as the
> existing code was a bit difficult to wrap one's head around.

I always hated this particular tracehook much more than others ;)

But the patch doesn't look right, please see below.

> -	signal = tracehook_notify_death(tsk, &cookie, group_dead);
> -	if (signal >= 0)
> -		signal = do_notify_parent(tsk, signal);
> +	/*
> +	 * Notify interested parent if the whole group is dead.  Ptracer
> +	 * should always be notified.  If something other than our normal
> +	 * parent is ptracing us, then send it a SIGCHLD instead of
> +	 * honoring exit_signal.  exit_signal only has special meaning to
> +	 * our real parent.
> +	 */
> +	if (!task_detached(tsk) && thread_group_empty(tsk)) {
> +		if (!ptrace_reparented(tsk))
> +			do_notify_parent(tsk, tsk->exit_signal);
> +		else
> +			do_notify_parent(tsk, SIGCHLD);

Forget about ptrace, suppose a single threaded child exits and its
parent ignores SIGCHLD. In this case do_notify_parent() sets
exit_signal = -1 to mark it dead, we should set exit_state = EXIT_DEAD
and release it.


Note! This looks very ugly, I wanted to cleanup this a long ago.
I think we should never change ->exit_signal, and do_notify_parent()
should return a boolean. I'll try to make the patches tomorrow.
Then _perhaps_ this patch will become simpler.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/