Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Add ARM cpu topology definition

[Amit Kucheria]

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Vincent Guittot
<vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 22 June 2011 12:14, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> +
>>> +#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu)    (cpu_topology[cpu].socket_id)
>>> +#define topology_core_id(cpu)                (cpu_topology[cpu].core_id)
>>> +#define topology_core_cpumask(cpu)   (&(cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling))
>>> +#define topology_thread_cpumask(cpu) (&(cpu_topology[cpu].thread_sibling))
>>
>> These #defines are not used anywhere.
>
> They are used in topology.c driver and sched.c
>
>>
>>> +#define mc_capable() (cpu_topology[0].socket_id != -1)
>>> +#define smt_capable()        (cpu_topology[0].thread_id != -1)
>>
>> Neither are these.
>
> They are used in sched.c
>

Ahh, sorry for the noise. Documentation/cputopology.txt is most illuminating.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/