Re: Union mount and overlayfs bake off?

[Michal Suchanek]

On 29 June 2011 11:39, Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think that it has been a while since David reposted the refreshed patch
> set for union mounts & know that overlayfs has recent updates as well.
>
> Despite that, I have not seen a lot of feedback from reviewers or testers.
>

I can only attest that I can build working live CD on top of either
overlayfs or unionmount.

This is not a good metric for reliability because issues were found
with both solutions after the live CDs were working fine already.

However, it is an usability metric in that both solutions are from the
alpha stage in which crucial features were missing or broken way into
the beta stage  in which corner case issues are discovered but the
solution is generally working.

Somebody was running racer on top of overlayfs which uncovered some
problems with overlayfs itself and linux vfs in general. Unionmount
has supposedly its own testsuite but I have never seen that.

There are some issues with neither creating full emulation of a
traditional filesystem and the cost of hiding more effects of the
union from userspace to make the filesystem look more traditional.

With something touching VFS, however, it is important to decide how
(and if) these corner case issues should be resolved because they
could possibly affect unrelated parts of the system. Reviewing all
raised concerns is unfortunately taking quite some time, and then
addressing them in code will probably require more.

Thanks

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/