Re: [RFC] ipc: introduce shm_rmid_forced sysctl

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Jun 29 2011 - 18:15:10 EST


On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:25:14 +0400
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This patch adds support for shm_rmid_forced sysctl. If set to 1, all
> shared memory objects in current ipc namespace will be automatically
> forced to use IPC_RMID. POSIX way of handling shmem allows to create
> shm objects and call shmdt() leaving shm object associated with no
> process, thus consuming memory not counted via rlimits. With
> shm_rmid_forced=1 the shared memory object is counted at least for one
> process, so OOM killer may effectively kill the fat process holding
> the shared memory.
>
> It obviously breaks POSIX, some programs relying on the feature would
> stop working. So, set shm_rmid_forced=1 only if you're sure nobody uses
> "orphaned" memory. shm_rmid_forced=0 by default for compatability
> reasons.
>
> The feature was previously impemented in -ow as a configure option.
>

What a horrid patch. But given the POSIX (mis?)feature I don't see a
better way, and the feature seems desirable. Sigh.

What sort of users would want to turn this on, and why?

> --- a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct ipc_namespace {
> size_t shm_ctlall;
> int shm_ctlmni;
> int shm_tot;
> + int shm_rmid_forced;
>
> struct notifier_block ipcns_nb;

Please send a patch which adds a nice comment to this field.

Perhaps shm_rmid_forced should have had bool type.

> --- a/ipc/shm.c
> +++ b/ipc/shm.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ void shm_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
> ns->shm_ctlmax = SHMMAX;
> ns->shm_ctlall = SHMALL;
> ns->shm_ctlmni = SHMMNI;
> + ns->shm_rmid_forced = 0;
> ns->shm_tot = 0;
> ipc_init_ids(&shm_ids(ns));
> }

The problem is that nobody will test your feature. So for testing
purposes, let's enable the feature by default. I assume this:

--- a/ipc/shm.c~ipc-introduce-shm_rmid_forced-sysctl-ipc-introduce-shm_rmid_forced-sysctl-testing
+++ a/ipc/shm.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ void shm_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *n
ns->shm_ctlmax = SHMMAX;
ns->shm_ctlall = SHMALL;
ns->shm_ctlmni = SHMMNI;
- ns->shm_rmid_forced = 0;
+ ns->shm_rmid_forced = 1;
ns->shm_tot = 0;
ipc_init_ids(&shm_ids(ns));
}

will do that?

> +static bool shm_may_destroy(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct shmid_kernel *shp)
> +{
> + return (shp->shm_nattch == 0) &&
> + (ns->shm_rmid_forced ||
> + (shp->shm_perm.mode & SHM_DEST));
> +}

Just because the existing code is crappily documented doesn't mean that
we have to copy that ;)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/