Re: [PATCH 3/3] MFD: MAX8997: IRQ definition moved to public header.

[MyungJoo Ham]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:56:27PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>
>> In order to request MAX8997's IRQs, these IRQ enums are required by
>> board files (such as /arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-*.c). So, these IRQ
>> enums are no more "private" to max8997 device drivers. Without this
>> patch, board files need to include max8997-private.h.
>
> Why does the board file need to request these IRQs?
>


It specifies which interrupts of MAX8997 are used.

In our code:
http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung/blob/eba500212699c0ad8d6bde0dc01c3ec7101f8154:/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/setup-charger.c
around line 85, it specifies which interrupt is going to be a
wakeup-source ("true"), how the power-managing S/W should interpret
them.

The interrupts not listed in the array are not used as a wakeup-source.

-- 
MyungJoo Ham, Ph.D.
Mobile Software Platform Lab,
Digital Media and Communications (DMC) Business
Samsung Electronics
cell: 82-10-6714-2858
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/