Re: [PATCH 1/3] ideapad: define cfg bits and create sysfs node forcfg

[Ike Panhc]

On 06/23/2011 03:35 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:05:43PM +0800, Ike Panhc wrote:
>>  static int __devinit ideapad_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *adevice)
>>  {
>> -	int ret, i, cfg;
>> +	int ret, i;
>> +	unsigned long cfg;
> 
> You change this to an unsigned long, but you cast it to an int in 
> several places. Is that just to avoid casting to a long here?
> 
>> -		if (test_bit(ideapad_rfk_data[i].cfgbit, (unsigned long *)&cfg))
>> +		if (test_bit(ideapad_rfk_data[i].cfgbit, &cfg))
> 
> I think it seems neater the other way around, but don't have terribly 
> strong opinions.
> 

I read again how cfg is used. They are 2 test_bit, one sprintf and
read_method_int.

test_bit is the major reason of changing from int to unsigned long. I will
change the format string in sprintf from %X to %lX. After the change there
will be only one cast left.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/