Re: NFS crash in un-modified 3.0.0-rc3+, list corruption.

[Ben Greear]

On 06/30/2011 11:25 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 04:26:48PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> > On 06/20/2011 03:42 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> > > This machine is acting as a server.  It is from linux-2.6, pulled
> > > today:
> > >
> > > commit de505e709ffb09a7382ca8e0d8c7dbb171ba5830
> > >
> > > We are hitting it with 200 clients reading and writing, mounting and
> > > un-mounting.
> > > This bug is fairly reproducible (twice today).
> > >
> > > Large amounts of debugging options are enabled.
> >
> > We were also starting/stopping NFS on the server machine.
> > It appears that this crash happens during the
> > /etc/init.d/nfs stop
> > command.
>
> I'll be submitting the below.
>
> The bug's been there for a really long time and we're getting late into
> the release cycle so I'll probably just save it for 3.1 (but it'll go to
> stable as well then).

Looks good to me!

Thanks,
Ben

> --b.
>
> commit 0f4bb2521a0e300443e9d80b10778f5a93cc0dbc
> Author: J. Bruce Fields<bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Wed Jun 29 16:49:04 2011 -0400
>
>      svcrpc: fix list-corrupting race on nfsd shutdown
>
>      After commit 3262c816a3d7fb1eaabce633caa317887ed549ae "[PATCH] knfsd:
>      split svc_serv into pools", svc_delete_xprt (then svc_delete_socket) no
>      longer removed its xpt_ready (then sk_ready) field from whatever list it
>      was on, noting that there was no point since the whole list was about to
>      be destroyed anyway.
>
>      That was mostly true, but forgot that a few svc_xprt_enqueue()'s might
>      still be hanging around playing with the about-to-be-destroyed list, and
>      could get themselves into trouble writing to freed memory if we left
>      this xprt on the list after freeing it.
>
>      (This is actually functionally identical to a patch made first by Ben
>      Greear, but with more comments.)
>
>      Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
>      Cc: gnb@xxxxxxxx
>      Reported-by: Ben Greear<greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>      Tested-by: Ben Greear<greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>      Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields<bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> index ab86b79..bd31208 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> @@ -902,12 +902,13 @@ void svc_delete_xprt(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
>   	if (!test_and_set_bit(XPT_DETACHED,&xprt->xpt_flags))
>   		list_del_init(&xprt->xpt_list);
>   	/*
> -	 * We used to delete the transport from whichever list
> -	 * it's sk_xprt.xpt_ready node was on, but we don't actually
> -	 * need to.  This is because the only time we're called
> -	 * while still attached to a queue, the queue itself
> -	 * is about to be destroyed (in svc_destroy).
> +	 * The only time we're called while xpt_ready is still on a list
> +	 * is while the list itself is about to be destroyed (in
> +	 * svc_destroy).  BUT svc_xprt_enqueue could still be attempting
> +	 * to add new entries to the sp_sockets list, so we can't leave
> +	 * a freed xprt on it.
>   	 */
> +	list_del_init(&xprt->xpt_ready);
>   	if (test_bit(XPT_TEMP,&xprt->xpt_flags))
>   		serv->sv_tmpcnt--;
>   	spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock);


--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/