Re: [PATCH] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:11:59AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Allow drivers to report at probe time that they cannot get all the resources
> required by the device, and should be retried at a later time.

When is "later"?

And why would a driver not be able to get all of the proper resources?

Why can't a bus, at a later time, just try to reprobe everything when it
determines that it is a "later" time now, without having to do this
added change to the core?

> This should completely solve the problem of getting devices
> initialized in the right order.  Right now this is mostly handled by
> mucking about with initcall ordering which is a complete hack, and
> doesn't even remotely handle the case where device drivers are in
> modules.  This approach completely sidesteps the issues by allowing
> driver registration to occur in any order, and any driver can request
> to be retried after a few more other drivers get probed.

Why would drivers in modules be an issue?  If a driver depends on
another driver, making it a module dependancy would solve the problem,
right?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/