Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: drop unnecessary kernel_eflags variable from 64bit.

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:00:12PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> For no reason that I can determine 64 bit x86 saves the current eflags
> in cpu_init purely for use in ret_from_fork. The equivalent 32 bit
> code simply hard codes 0x0202 as the new EFLAGS which seems safer than
> relying on a potentially arbitrary EFLAGS saved during cpu_init.
> 
> Original i386 changeset
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=47a5c6fa0e204a2b63309c648bb2fde36836c826
> Original x86_64 changset
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=658fdbef66e5e9be79b457edc2cbbb3add840aa9
> 
> The only comment in the later indicates that it is following the
> former, but not why it differs in this way.
> 
> This change makes 64 bit use the same mechanism to setup the initial
> EFLAGS on fork. Note that 64 bit resets EFLAGS before calling
> schedule_tail() as opposed to 32 bit which calls schedule_tail()
> first. Therefore the correct value for EFLAGS has opposite IF
> bit. This will be fixed in a subsequent patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx

The whole series looks good to me, thanks Ian! I hope I don't
miss anything, so lets wait for more feedback ;)

	Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/