Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the ext4 tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:36:25 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in
> fs/ext4/inode.c between commit dae1e52cb126 ("ext4: move ext4_ind_*
> functions from inode.c to indirect.c") from the ext4 tree and commit
> d1769fea6879 ("fs: simplify the blockdev_direct_IO prototype") from the
> vfs tree.
> 
> A function moved to a new file.  I fixed it up and can carry the fix as
> necessary.
> 
> I also needed the following merge fix patch:

This patchg is now needed after merging the ext4 tree with Linius' tree
(repeated here):

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:28:44 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] vfs/ext4: merge fixup for moved function

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ext4/indirect.c |    6 ++----
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/indirect.c b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
index 6c27111..b8602cd 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/indirect.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
@@ -806,10 +806,8 @@ retry:
 				 offset, nr_segs,
 				 ext4_get_block, NULL, NULL, 0);
 	else {
-		ret = blockdev_direct_IO(rw, iocb, inode,
-				 inode->i_sb->s_bdev, iov,
-				 offset, nr_segs,
-				 ext4_get_block, NULL);
+		ret = blockdev_direct_IO(rw, iocb, inode, iov,
+				 offset, nr_segs, ext4_get_block);
 
 		if (unlikely((rw & WRITE) && ret < 0)) {
 			loff_t isize = i_size_read(inode);
-- 
1.7.5.4

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/