Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1
From: Avi Kivity
Date: Mon Jul 25 2011 - 04:36:23 EST
On 07/25/2011 11:31 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
In Ingo's reasoning, the next step would be to rewrite glibc and put it into the kernel tree, because we end up adding syscalls so adding them to the in-kernel libc with the same commit would be a lot easier and cleaner.
That actually makes a ton of sense. One immediate win would be that
klibc can be tuned to the kernel it ships with (the dynamic loader will
pick the correct object), so less #ifdef trees. Another would be to
make klibc the formal kernel interface, which allows us to reimplement
an older interface in terms of the one that supercedes it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/